The New Labour Government and the Public’s Growing Contempt for Sir Keir Starmer
The British public's disdain for Sir Keir Starmer is becoming increasingly evident, as more people awaken to his troubling record, particularly during his tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) from 2008 to 2013. Starmer, the former chief prosecutor of England and Wales, played a role in shielding high-profile individuals from facing justice. This legacy of institutional protectionism, combined with his failure to address corruption within the Met Police and judicial system, has left many questioning his integrity.
Starmer's Role in Cover-Ups
As DPP, Starmer was in a prime position to prosecute elite figures involved in some of the UK’s most shocking scandals. However, his tenure was marked by systematic inaction. Instead of holding the powerful accountable, many cases involving high-profile paedophiles were quietly dismissed, delayed, or under-prosecuted. This has led critics to argue that Starmer operated as a gatekeeper for the establishment, ensuring that elite wrongdoers never saw the inside of a courtroom.
This is not a baseless claim. Documents and parliamentary records from that period show that Starmer was aware of numerous cases but failed to act decisively. The widespread corruption within the British legal system, exposed by whistleblowers and independent investigators, only deepens the suspicions surrounding his leadership.
Elon Musk Exposes Starmer on X
The rise of alternative media platforms has allowed for greater scrutiny of figures like Starmer, and none has been more influential in this regard than Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter). Musk, who has championed free speech, has increasingly highlighted Starmer’s failures, censorship tactics, and connections to the deep state. Unlike the mainstream media, which continues to shield the Labour leader from difficult questions, X provides a platform for exposing his murky past.
Musk’s platform has become a hub for whistleblowers and independent journalists to discuss cases that Starmer and his allies would rather keep buried. As a result, Starmer and the Labour Party have ramped up their calls for censorship and tighter regulations on online speech—moves that conveniently align with the globalist agenda of controlling narratives.
New Labour’s Legacy of Corruption
Starmer's role in the current Labour Party is a continuation of the New Labour legacy—one deeply embedded in deception, surveillance, and authoritarianism. The New Labour government under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown was notorious for:
- Mass surveillance laws that eroded British freedoms.
- Fabricated intelligence to justify the Iraq War.
- Deep ties to media corruption, with outlets like the BBC acting as state propaganda machines.
- State-sponsored takedowns of entities that embarrassed the government, such as Confidential Access, a site that provided an identity-changing service before it was dismantled through police-led intimidation and BBC collusion.
The Public’s Growing Resentment
Despite efforts by the establishment to prop up Starmer as a "moderate" and "safe" alternative to the Conservatives, the British public is increasingly seeing through the illusion. His robotic personality, lack of conviction, and past legal cover-ups make him an untrustworthy figure. As public awareness of his past continues to grow—thanks in part to platforms like X—it is becoming clear that Starmer represents the very system that many Brits despise.
The question remains: Will the British people allow another establishment figure to seize power, or will they reject the status quo in favor of true political change?
- 13471 Comments
- 131935 Views
- Share:
Add Comment
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
- Your name, rating, website address, town, country, state and comment will be publicly displayed if entered.
- Aside from the data entered into these form fields, other stored data about your comment will include:
- Your IP address (not displayed)
- The time/date of your submission (displayed)
- Your email address will not be shared. It is collected for only two reasons:
- Administrative purposes, should a need to contact you arise.
- To inform you of new comments, should you subscribe to receive notifications.
- A cookie may be set on your computer. This is used to remember your inputs. It will expire by itself.
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
- Although the administrator will attempt to moderate comments, it is impossible for every comment to have been moderated at any given time.
- You acknowledge that all comments express the views and opinions of the original author and not those of the administrator.
- You agree not to post any material which is knowingly false, obscene, hateful, threatening, harassing or invasive of a person's privacy.
- The administrator has the right to edit, move or remove any comment for any reason and without notice.
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments (3)
Looks like they ***** you big time!
Create a Trump rant at Rodney
Tommy Robinsons appeal get Judge Deed to kick up about it